月度归档： 2025 年 11 月

The significance of establishing the State Administration of Market Supervision： the welcome stage of market supervision

　　On March 30th, the seven departments jointly held a video teleconference on the 2018 national agricultural anti-counterfeiting special action, summed up the work in 2017 and the past five years, and deployed the key work of agricultural anti-counterfeiting in 2018.

　　Among these seven departments, there is the State Administration of Market Supervision established in accordance with the Plan for Deepening the Reform of Party and State Institutions.

　　According to industry experts interviewed by the reporter of Legal Daily, the establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision means that the supervision of the market has entered a new stage.

　　It is not a simple merger between institutions.

　　The Plan for Deepening the Reform of Party and State Institutions points out that reforming the market supervision system and implementing unified market supervision are the key links to establish a unified, open, competitive and orderly modern market system. In order to improve the market supervision system, promote the implementation of the strategy of strengthening the country by quality, create an honest and trustworthy market environment, further promote the comprehensive law enforcement of market supervision, strengthen the supervision of product quality and safety, and make the people feel at ease in buying, using and eating, the responsibilities of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, and china food and drug administration, The responsibilities of price supervision and inspection and anti-monopoly law enforcement of the National Development and Reform Commission, centralized anti-monopoly law enforcement of the operators of the Ministry of Commerce and the office of the the State Council Anti-monopoly Committee were integrated, and the State Administration of Market Supervision was established as a directly affiliated institution of the State Council.

　　"Before the reform of the party and state institutions, the functions of market supervision and management were scattered in different departments, resulting in a so-called ‘ Jiulong Water Control ’ Phenomenon. To use a common saying that people are familiar with, it is ‘ Seven or eight big caps can’t control a broken straw hat ’ . Although several departments perform their respective duties, they can’t hold a fist in market supervision, which wastes human and material resources to a certain extent and can’t supervise the market effectively and efficiently. At the same time, this has also led to food and drug fraud, illegal business operations of small business hawkers and other violations of the rights and interests of the people. " Wang Yukai, a professor at the National School of Administration, said.

　　The establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision is considered to be an effective solution to the problem of "water control in Kowloon".

　　"However, it needs to be clear that the establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision is not a simple combination between departments, but on the basis of following market rules, it breaks down the barriers between departments in the past and regroups the functions and businesses of various departments." Wang Yukai said.

　　Wang Jingbo, dean of the Institute of Government under the Rule of Law of China University of Political Science and Law, also believes that the establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision is to realize the reconstruction, integration and convergence of "you have me and I have you" among different departments.

　　Form a comprehensive law enforcement team

　　With regard to the responsibilities of the State Administration of Market Supervision, the Plan for Deepening the Reform of the Party and State Institutions stipulates that it is responsible for comprehensive market supervision and management, uniformly registering market entities and establishing information publicity and sharing mechanisms, organizing comprehensive law enforcement of market supervision, undertaking unified anti-monopoly law enforcement, standardizing and maintaining market order, organizing the implementation of the strategy of strengthening the country by quality, supervising the quality and safety of industrial products, food safety and special equipment safety, and uniformly managing measurement standards, inspection and testing, certification and accreditation, etc.

　　Among these responsibilities, "organizing comprehensive law enforcement of market supervision" has attracted people’s attention.

　　"Comprehensive law enforcement has many meanings, both centralized and multi-departmental. The integration of departmental law enforcement teams is mainly reflected in the integration and change of administrative management. This kind of reform and adjustment has many positive meanings and highlights different from the past. For example, improve the supervision efficiency in various fields, bridge the original separation between departments, adapt to the staged expectations of economic development, and adapt to the development needs of the new economy. It can be said that this reform is based on the principle of simplification, unification and efficiency, and it is a whole-process, full-chain supervision mechanism and system that has been redefined and constructed. This reform direction is in line with the people’s hearts and is completely correct. " Wang Jingbo said.

　　"In the past, as long as each department had functions related to market supervision, it would set up its own law enforcement team. For example, the quality supervision department has the law enforcement team of the quality supervision department, the industrial and commercial department has the law enforcement team of the industrial and commercial department, and the food and drug supervision department also has the law enforcement team of the food and drug supervision department. Now it is different. A large overall market supervision pattern is taking shape, and the law enforcement team will be reorganized and integrated to adapt to the overall market supervision pattern. It is foreseeable that in the future, several new and comprehensive law enforcement teams will be re-planned, which can avoid the confusion of law enforcement and the lack of purpose caused by each management. " Wang Yukai said.

　　Wang Yukai told the "Legal Daily" reporter that after the establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision, the construction and optimization of the law enforcement team will be greatly strengthened, which is of great benefit to realizing the market supervision function, maintaining the socialist market economic order, protecting the rights and interests of ordinary people from infringement, and cracking down on fraud and counterfeiting.

　　The regulatory capacity has been greatly improved.

　　The establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision is undoubtedly a great change in market supervision, and a brand-new market supervision system is ready to emerge.

　　"In the past, decentralized supervision of various departments has now become unified centralized supervision. Under the new supervision pattern, we can form a very good institutional model in organizing market supervision and promoting comprehensive law enforcement, and truly avoid problems such as decentralized governance and overlapping functions, so that market supervision departments can better serve the people. This is also the purpose and significance of the reform of the party and state institutions. " Wang Yukai said.

　　"The previous supervision method was fragmented. After the establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision, the supervision has the ability to integrate. Especially with the development of science and technology, technologies such as big data have been fully applied, and many information barriers have naturally been opened. Under this new regulatory pattern, the regulatory capacity will definitely be greatly improved. " Wang Jingbo said.

　　Wang Yukai told reporters: "Previously, many places have integrated the departments related to market supervision. It can be said that the establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision is natural and natural, which is of great significance to the long-term healthy development of China’s future market supervision pattern and market economic order. "

　　"After the establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision, the supervision of the market will be strengthened. With the strengthening of this supervision, the guarantee and expectation of product quality will be higher. The higher the quality of products, the people can buy and use with confidence. In this way, we can enter a virtuous circle process, and also promote market competition more effectively, thus bringing more vitality and benefits to the long-term, sustained and healthy development of the economy and society. In addition, higher efficiency and lower administrative costs have always been the goal of government reform. Therefore, the establishment of the State Administration of Market Supervision is of great benefit to improving market order and improving people’s lives. " Wang Jingbo said.

NATO Secretary General falsely claimed that ＂China and Russia threaten the existing international order＂ Jin Yinan： China maintains a fair and just international order with practical actions!

According to reports, NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg, who has repeatedly preached the so-called "China-Russia threat theory", once again boasted that China and Russia are challenging the "existing international order" and trying to satisfy their own interests by rewriting the "rules", and Europe should join hands with the United States to stop the "attempts" of China and Russia. So what does Stoltenberg mean by the so-called "existing international order"? Who is challenging the existing international order? Please pay attention to the Voice of China National Defense Time and Space "One South Military Forum".
Data Map: NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg (World Wide Web)
Moderator: On February 17th, local time, the meeting of defense ministers of NATO member countries was held by video. Before the meeting, NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg announced that the meeting would conduct extensive discussions on the "Sino-Russian threat". During the meeting, Stoltenberg once again stated that "Europe and the United States should defend the’ existing international order’, and China and Russia are challenging this order." Professor Yinan, what do you think of Stoltenberg’s accusations against China and Russia?
Jin Yinan: As the Secretary General of NATO, Stoltenberg falsely claimed that "China and Russia pose a threat to the world order". So how does Russia threaten the world order? Obviously, NATO violated the agreement reached with former Soviet leader Gorbachev, which clearly stated that NATO’s eastward expansion would never exceed the German border. However, NATO violated the agreement and gradually expanded eastward to the three Baltic countries, and then got its hands on Ukraine and Georgia until it reached the backyard of Russia. Stoltenberg said, how much threat does NATO pose to Russia and how does Russia threaten it? After Putin took office as Russian president in 2000, he was bent on good relations with western countries. At that time, Putin felt that the future of Russia lies in its integration into the West. As a result, Putin was enthusiastic and posted a "cold ass" in Europe. It was NATO itself that forced Russia into an enemy.
Today, Stoltenberg also falsely claims that China poses a threat to the world order. How does the development of China threaten NATO? Why does NATO have to be an enemy of China militarily? In the past two years, NATO members have been sending warships to the South China Sea and the East China Sea. What are you doing around China, not far from Wan Li? Did Chinese send warships to the English Channel? Did you go to the Mediterranean? Is China a real threat to western countries? There is no such thing. Therefore, from the overall international situation, we can see that a group of people, represented by Stoltenberg, have distorted the basic facts of international politics to such an absurd extent that they are completely out of thin air. Just like an old saying in China: "There is nothing in the world, and much ado about nothing." This is NATO.
Moderator: Yes, the existing international order was formed after the end of World War II. It is an international order and system with the United Nations as the core and based on the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter. "Peace and development" is the mainstream idea that runs through it. However, in the 70-odd years after the end of World War II, the international community not only failed to completely put an end to the war, but fell into an almost continuous conflict. So, who is challenging and undermining the international order?
Jin Yinan: From the founding of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, to the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the outbreak of the Iraqi war in 2003, the world has never been peaceful and plunged into continuous wars until today. Including the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the Iraq War and the Afghanistan War, NATO was all involved. Moreover, NATO has also intervened in the Libyan war and the Syrian war. Today, the refugee problem has piled up. It is entirely NATO itself that has lifted a rock and dropped it on its own feet. NATO has created an unsafe situation for itself.
Because NATO’s appetite is too big, their hands are too long, they want to take care of too many things, and they have destroyed other countries to a great extent, so today they have encountered such a rebound. In fact, NATO’s real threat is not from China and Russia at all, but from its own excessive ambition and its ability that does not match its ambition. This dilemma is its greatest threat.
Data Map: NATO Summit (Xinhua News Agency)
Moderator: Stoltenberg’s old-fashioned hype that "China and Russia challenge the existing international order" was refuted by former US military officials. Scott Ritter, a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer, recently pointed out in an article that Stoltenberg’s so-called "international order" seems to be centered on the United Nations system, but in fact it is decided and managed by the United States. What do you think of this?
Jin Yinan: What they call an "international order" is an "international order" dominated by the United States and the West. In what they call the "international order", they will always be the country on the top of the mountain, and other countries have to crawl at their feet and submit to their "international order". In fact, the order they are talking about is the order of neocolonialism. In the past, old colonialism was to occupy a country’s territory, and then create a government that obeyed him and practiced colonial rule. Neo-colonialism is not. A neo-colonial country can have its own government, but the West should control its economic lifeline, its political lifeline, its military security and train its own agents.
The west wants to use local people to govern local people, but it represents the interests of the west. This is the "international order" that they are most keen on. The order we are talking about is that all countries are equal, and all ethnic groups and races are equal. All problems should be solved through consultation instead of war. They are completely different from the order we talk about. The order they talk about is that they can violate all the rules, even those they make, but others must abide by the rules they make. This is what they call "order". And they simply don’t allow the United Nations, for example, developing countries to become rule makers, which they don’t allow. Only the United States and the West can make rules, the whole world can only obey the rules they make, and the United States and the West can not obey them. This is their ideal "international order".
Of course, they feel that their ideal order is threatened today. China, including Russia, we are opposed to the western order. We are opposed to this so-called order that they do not implement the rules formulated by the West themselves and let others implement them. If they say that China and Russia want to subvert the "international order", these countries, represented by China and Russia, are advocating an international order that is fairer, more just, more vital and more in line with the interests of more countries, rather than just safeguarding the interests of a few hegemonic western countries. This is the biggest difference.
Data Map: The second batch of China medical experts who went to Italy to fight the epidemic, including 13 people and a large amount of materials, flew to Milan, Italy on the evening of March 18, 2020 (People’s Daily Weibo).
Moderator: For more than 70 years after the end of World War II, China has been committed to its own development, and has never forgotten to assume international responsibilities, and has always played a constructive role in safeguarding world peace and development, defending and improving the international order and system. In the report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, "persistently promoting the building of a community of human destiny" is regarded as one of the "basic strategies" for upholding and developing Socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era. China is not only a destroyer of the world order, but a real builder of world peace, a contributor to global development and a defender of the international order.
Jin Yinan: That’s right. Especially from the COVID-19 epidemic that lasted from 2020 to today, with the global epidemic of COVID-19, if you look at the situation of western countries grabbing vaccines and monopolizing vaccines today, how can there be any international order? Because vaccines engage in the cold war and because vaccines engage in racism, these behaviors have appeared in the West. Vaccines must first be supplied to western countries, to a few white countries and to the vast number of developing countries. Do they call this a "reasonable international order"?
Moreover, the West will also ban China’s vaccine and Russian vaccine. China and Russia are now widely providing vaccines to developing countries and many countries that can’t get vaccines from western countries. Now many EU countries have also accepted vaccines from China. This is a reasonable international order. They think the most reasonable order in the west should be the best thing. They use it first, and then let others use it after they have used it. The international order we advocate is not like this. The international order we advocate is that the fruits of any scientific and technological development should first be shared by all mankind, and should first be provided to more countries as public goods of the world. This is the difference, this is the difference between our understanding of the international order and their understanding in the West, and this difference in understanding has been manifested in their own practical actions.
Data Map: US Army armored vehicles participating in the "European Defender -2020" exercise (World Wide Web)
Moderator: At the meeting of defense ministers of NATO member countries, Stoltenberg also alarmingly said that the rise of China may bring "consequences" to the collective security, prosperity and lifestyle of its allies. Therefore, NATO should deepen its cooperation with partner countries and with Australia and Japan. Professor Yinan, as NATO Secretary-General, what is the real purpose of Stoltenberg’s remarks?
Jin Yinan: The establishment of NATO was based on the Cold War. The cold war is over, and the Soviet Union, NATO’s main rival when it was founded, is gone, so NATO must build an opponent now. Because NATO’s life depends on opponents, without opponents, the necessity of this organization’s existence is gone, and it should be dissolved. Therefore, Trump once ridiculed that NATO is an "outdated dinosaur", which is still a great blow to NATO. Now, Biden wants to strengthen the relationship between the United States and the European Union and between the United States and Europe. Therefore, Stoltenberg lost no time to vigorously speculate on NATO’s main opponents in the future.
On the one hand, he wants to highlight the necessity of NATO’s existence, saying that with the existence of China and Russia, NATO still has enemies, and with the existence of enemies, NATO’s alliance is necessary. On the other hand, he is also interested in voting for Biden, who wants to regard Russia as his main enemy and China as his main competitor. Stoltenberg then said, Look at me, NATO, and I am willing to be your loyal thug and your loyal partner in the United States. He is asking for credit from the United States.
In fact, including Australia and Japan, the reason why NATO wants to win over these countries is just to make these countries become NATO’s "chess pieces". Finally, complete the so-called NATO strategic vision. In other words, NATO wants to maintain its own survival as well as its own development. This is the whole wishful thinking of NATO.
Reporting/feedback