Many people ridicule that it is the next generation of network car, which is not expensive to sell and the configuration is OK. The key is that it has low energy consumption and good economy! In fact, Tucki’s previous car energy consumption control was also good, but the latest MONA heard that it was even worse. We are also very curious about the level of power consumption and endurance achievement rate of this car.
Therefore, we have arranged the endurance test of two scenes simultaneously, one is the high-speed road test, and the other is the urban road test. Besides this endurance test, I have been driving this car back and forth for several days, so I can give you a more comprehensive experience.
First of all, the endurance performance, we still follow the test route of previous tests, located in Nanda trunk line. On the test day, the outdoor temperature was about 32 degrees Celsius, the fast-charging pile was fully charged, the kinetic energy recovery was adjusted to the maximum, the driving mode was adjusted to the energy-saving mode, the air conditioner was adjusted to 24 degrees Celsius to circulate the automatic wind, and the subtotal mileage was cleared, and the tire pressure was maintained at about 240kpa.
Nanda trunk line is a relatively long expressway with a speed limit of 80 km/h. After we are fully charged, we basically run around this road. Except for turning around at both ends and waiting at traffic lights, they are basically driving near the speed limit, but in the end, the average speed is about 60km/h, which can better represent the daily commuting power consumption.
The car we got was an entry-level version of the 515 endurance car, but when the endurance reached 0%, it drove 518km. At this time, the achievement rate exceeded expectations, and it ran for another 9 km until the power was limited. The final result was locked at 527km, and the endurance achievement rate was 102%. The meter showed that the power consumption was 9Wh/100km, which showed the last 100 km, but even if it was calculated according to the electricity, the 51.8-degree electricity ran 50 km.
And on the day of the test, my colleagues in Beijing also took a Tucki, 620 model with a long battery life, and they went directly to the high speed, holding up the live broadcast test at a speed of 120km/h, and finally the power consumption per 100 km was 12.6kWh/100km, which was also very low.
And this 515km version of Tucki, I have experienced five days back and forth, and I have also driven violently, and the power consumption is in the early 14kWh/100km. Therefore, if I drive steadily every day, this endurance performance can be achieved by anyone, which is enough to show that the power consumption of MONA M03 in Tucki is superior to that of the trams on the market at present, regardless of the middle and high speed scenes.
It is also the lowest power consumption among the models we are currently testing.
Some netizens think that the price of this car’s low power consumption is weak power. In fact, to be honest, the control of this car is more advantageous for the same price model, and the feelings of the three driving modes are also different. The economy and comfort modes are similar, but the comfort mode will have a little stronger power in the front and back stages, and the sports mode will be full of power from the beginning.
Kinetic energy recovery can be closed and adjustable in three gears. High kinetic energy recovery will nod a little after releasing the throttle, and it needs to be adapted to the body. It is recommended to open it in the middle and low for daily driving to ensure the comfort of the body and improve the battery life.
MONA in Tucki is relatively easy to drive as a whole, and it is not quite the same as Tucki before. In the past, even if the steering wheel was turned to sport mode, the overall feel was still light, and the medium and large SUVs like that were also very light, while MONA’s steering was obviously much tighter, and the switch damping seemed to be tighter.
Chassis can be regarded as the normal level of this level. The former McPherson rear torsion beam is relatively resilient when passing through some speed bumps at low speed, and it is quite satisfactory for filtering fine vibrations. It will feel less comfortable when encountering relatively large ups and downs, but the overall afterlife is still in line with the tonality of this price.
The layout of the whole car is very simple. There is only one screen in the central control area, and there is no instrument. The overall operation logic is more like the old Tesla, and the operating system interface is relatively simple. Fortunately, most operations can be realized by voice, but this voice does not seem to support multiple voice commands. Only 1-2 commands can be completed at a time, but the recognition accuracy is still ok.
Then the automatic parking recognition rate of this car is average, but as long as most parking spaces are recognized, they can basically be listened to well, and there are 360 images, which can also help you park in reverse, but the rear camera position is low, which may be covered by mud in rainy days. It is best to wipe it in rainy days.
In terms of intelligent driving, this version of my test drive does not have high-speed and intelligent driving in urban areas, but it has a lane intelligent cruise mode, which can drive at the set speed when the lane is set. If you encounter a vehicle in front of you, it will automatically accelerate and decelerate. To a certain extent, it can still better alleviate fatigue, but the power consumption will increase slightly after opening.
In terms of space performance, Tucki is relatively in line with his size, but personally, he feels that the seat cushion angle of the whole vehicle is relatively straight, especially in the back row. Then the spatial performance is basically the performance of an A-class car. The sitting posture of the main driver will be higher than that of the fuel car, and the driver’s seat needs to be adjusted to a slightly larger angle to be more comfortable.
Generally speaking, this car is very cost-effective in the price range of 120,000-150,000. Not only is it low in daily energy consumption, but it is also relatively easy to drive. At the same time, its experience and convenience are relatively advanced. It is perfect for daily urban transportation. I wonder if you are satisfied with the performance of this car? Let’s discuss it in the comment area!