Beijing Three-Man Basketball Open Finals End

On the evening of September 17th, after two days of fierce competition, the FIBA Open 3×3 Yanjing Beer Cup Beijing Three-Man Basketball Open Finals ended successfully at the National Speed Skating Hall (Ice Ribbon). In the race for the first and second place, V10 Junda beat Beijing Jianyou in overtime to win the Beijing championship. In October, the two teams will join hands in the national finals held in Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, and compete with teams from other seven provinces (cities) for the national championship.

FIBA Open 3×3 Yanjing Beer Cup Beijing Three-Man Basketball Open was hosted by FIBA China District, hosted by Beijing Sports Industry Association and Beijing Basketball Association, and named Yanjing Beer. Since its launch on August 19th, the event has taken the form of "5+1", passing through five sub-races of Shougang Park, Olympic Sports Center, Yizhuang, Changying and Wukesong, and the Beijing Finals held at the National Speed Skating Hall (Ice Ribbon). The 20 teams in the finals are composed of the top four in each of the five sub-races.

The competition attracted nearly 100 teams and more than 500 players to sign up through FIBA Basketball’s official APP. Both the five-station race and the finals were broadcast live on the official short video platform, and netizens said that the competition was exciting and intense, with a strong impression.

It is worth mentioning that before the last day of the game, small players from Youken Basketball Club formed an orange team and a blue team, and played a juvenile version of 3×3 basketball showdown to warm up for the upcoming 8-in-4 knockout. Jiao Jian, president of the Youth Committee of the Beijing Basketball Association, said: "The popularization and promotion of youth basketball is very important. The 3×3 basketball is relatively simple to set up, and two teams and six people can play it, so that children can get started more easily and experience the joy of basketball more."

Text/Beijing Youth Daily reporter Song Xiang

Editor/Zhang Kunlong

Reporting/feedback

Bayern’s 1-3RB Leipzig score: Leipzig has the highest score of 1, while Bayern has the lowest score.

Live on May 21 ST, Beijing time on the morning of May 21 ST, in the 33 rd round of the Bundesliga, Bayern lost 1-3 to RB Leipzig. "Pictorial" scores the players of the two teams (the lower the score, the better the performance).

Bayern starting: Sommer (3 points) Mazravi (5 points) pawar (5 points) Driget (4 points) Cancelo (4 points) kimmich (4 points) Grecka (5 points) Koman (5 points) Mucia La (4 points) Gnabry (3 points) Mueller (4 points).

Bayern substitute: Sane (4 points) Gravenberger (5 points)

RB Leipzig starting: Blashevich (2 points) hals Tengberg (3 points) Gvardiol (3 points) Alban (3 points) Simakan (5 points) haidara (3 points) Lemer (1 point) Olmer (3 points) Sobersloy (1 point) Nkunku (1 point) Andre Silva (5 points).

RB Leipzig substitute: Henrichs (3 points) Campr (3 points) Vosberg (3 points)

(Sonnytime)

How to treat manual quality inspection and intelligent quality inspection?

The purpose of intelligent quality inspection is to replace manual inspection with robots and help enterprise managers solve the problem of manual quality inspection. Compared with manual work, intelligent quality inspection can reduce the labor cost by more than 90%, improve the quality inspection efficiency, and achieve 100% full coverage, which brings a new management mode to the customer service center.

What does traditional quality inspection depend on? The naked eye, experience. Problems: different quality inspection standards, low efficiency and low coverage.

Only 1%-2%. With the increase of business volume of enterprises, quality inspectors can’t detect every recording and record, and usually adopt sampling method, which is easy to miss inspection, not only ignoring a large number of work recordings, but also leading to the lack of representativeness of quality inspection results.

Generally, the fastest time for manual quality inspection is the next day to conduct sampling inspection on the recordings or records of the previous day, so managers cannot find problems at the first time and deal with risks in time.

Changes in indicators and business are not linked to quality inspection in time, so it is impossible to find possible problems in time and intelligently.

The results of manual quality inspection are limited by the subjective thinking and professional judgment of quality inspectors, and different quality inspectors have different testing standards, which leads to the lack of objectivity of quality inspection results.

What does AI quality inspection depend on? Constantly optimized AI capabilities. From human to AI, there are many changes: reducing labor costs, improving coverage, unifying testing standards, and improving efficiency … The emergence and application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has made it possible to make up for the shortcomings of manual quality inspection.

  • Improve the efficiency of manual quality inspection

Solve the problems of low sampling rate and low efficiency of manual quality inspection, and the quality inspection coverage rate is 100%, which greatly improves the quality inspection efficiency.

  • Improve the skills of employees

Complete dimension evaluation, analyze and extract effective skills in high-quality voice cases, and improve business skills through employee learning and training.

  • Comprehensive business public opinion analysis

Mining users’ high-frequency problems, quickly finding and feedback, is convenient for managers to formulate effective strategies before risks are formed, thus curbing the scope of influence and optimizing service strategies.

  • Improve customer satisfaction

Solve the feedback problem, improve customer satisfaction, effectively discover the knowledge that customer service lacks, help customer service improve service quality, and improve customer service satisfaction. Excavate high-frequency problems, feed back to business optimization practice, and effectively reduce customer complaint rate.